Controversy
Over Fish Oil Supplements and Sudden Death Risk
Daily supplements of a fatty acid found
in fish oil cuts the risk of sudden death by half in people who have
had heart attacks.
Despite this finding from a new Italian
study, the American Heart Association says it cannot
yet recommend these supplements. Even more discouraging, another expert
says many cardiologists are not telling patients about this benefit
and drug companies are studiously avoiding the subject.
The report comes from a study that enrolled
more than 11,000 Italians who survived heart attacks. They all got the
usual medical treatment and lifestyle advice. In addition, some took
1 gram a day of a supplement containing n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
(PUFA), also known as omega-3 fatty acids, the kind found in fish oil.
Others took a vitamin E supplement, still others took both, and a control
group took neither.
After three months, says a report in the
journal Circulation, there was a significant difference
in the incidence of sudden death—0.5 percent for those taking the PUFA
supplement, 0.7 percent for those who did not. The difference persisted
after 42 months—a 2 percent risk of sudden death for those taking PUFA,
2.7 percent risk for those who did not. The overall death rate was 8.4
percent for PUFA people, 9.8 percent for the others—again, statistically
significant.
"At the end of the study, we realized that
there was a significant reduction of total mortality, whereas the reduction
of all cardiovascular events was not statistically significant," says
Dr. Roberto Marchioli, leader of the study.
The risk of sudden death is highest in
the months after a heart attack, Marchioli notes, which is exactly when
the fish oil supplement benefit is clearest. That benefit is not related
to cholesterol levels or a reduction in blood clots, he says.
"It seems to support the idea that the
mechanism of action of the fatty acids is a reduction in arrhythmias,"
Marchioli says. The current theory is PUFA helps keep the heartbeat
normal by regulating the electrical activity of heart muscle cells.
"We know the molecular mechanism by which
these fatty acids stabilize the heart electrically," says Dr. Alexander
Leaf, professor of clinical medicine at Harvard Medical School and author
of an accompanying editorial. Work in his laboratory has shown PUFA
makes heart cells resistant to arrhythmias.
The finding needs confirmation, Marchioli
says, and Leaf agrees that "we need a few more careful clinical trials
of people at risk of sudden death."
The American Heart Association
says it does not recommend fish oil supplements and will not recommend
them "until there is compelling evidence that they benefit overall cardiovascular
health." The organization does, however, recommend eating plenty of
fish.
That's all well and good, says Marchioli,
but "not all people like fish, and in addition it is rather difficult
to eat fatty fish every day of one's life."
A Tuna
Sandwich a Day Keeps Heart Problems at Bay?
Two additional studies affirm the beneficial
value of fish in the diet in preventing the kind of blockage of arteries
that leads to heart attacks and to strokes. In fact, the recommendation
is if you want to reduce your risk of a heart attack by more than 20
percent, just eat a tuna fish sandwich not once a day, but once a month.
And while both studies come from Boston,
"the land of the bean and the cod," cod is not high on the list of the
best fish to eat. That's because the benefit comes from the omega-3
fatty acids, also called polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), says Dr.
JoAnn E. Manson, chief of preventive medicine at Harvard's Brigham and
Women's Hospital and a co-author of the study that appears in a recent
issue of the Journal of the American Association (JAMA).
While eating cod is not a bad idea, fish
that are especially rich in PUFAs are mackerel, salmon, sardines—and
tuna, Manson says.
Researchers have long noticed that groups
of people who eat lots of fish have a lower death rate from heart disease;
in Alaska, it's known as the "Eskimo paradox."
The findings, based on analysis of the
16-year Nurses Health Study of nearly 85,000 women, found a neat relationship
between fish intake and the risk of heart disease and death. Women who
ate fish one to three times a month reduced that risk by 21 percent,
compared to those who had less than one serving of fish each month.
The risk is lower progressively as fish
intake increases, with a reduction of 34 percent for more than five
fish meals a week, but the significant reduction can come from just
that one tuna sandwich a month, Manson says.
"There appear to be three mechanisms by
which the long-chain, omega-3 fatty acids act," Manson says. "One, there
is a favorable effect on blood cholesterol. Two, there is a lowering
of the tendency for blood clots. Three, there is also an effect on heart
rhythm, a reduction in harmful arrhythmias."
The study does break some new ground, Manson
says, because it is "the first large-scale study of fish intake and
the risk of heart disease in women. The risk has been studied primarily
in men, but the findings apply to both sexes."
The newest report on men, also from Brigham
and Women's Hospital, concerns the Physicians' Health Study, which has
followed 22,000 male physicians for more than 17 years. It looked at
blood levels of PUFAs and found them "strongly associated with a reduced
risk of sudden death among men without evidence of prior cardiovascular
disease." That study appeared in the April 11 issue of the New
England Journal of Medicine, and was released a day early to
coincide with the Nurses Health Study report.
Both studies come on the heels of the Italian
report (above) saying that daily supplements of PUFAs cut the risk of
sudden death by half. Right now, the American Heart Association says
it is best to get PUFAs from fish, rather than supplements.
Both American studies and the one from
Italy (above) will be considered when the AHA's nutrition
committee meets next week, says Dr. Alice H. Lichtenstein, professor
of nutrition at Tufts University and vice chairwoman of the committee.
It is not possible to predict what the committee will decide, and any
change in recommendations probably will not come quickly, she says.
"We will reconsider the position," Lichtenstein
says. "Prior to this, there has not been enough data to make a recommendation
on fish oil supplements. Now we have to go back and look at the new
data."
Always consult your physician regarding
what is recommended for your individual health.
|
May 2002
A Tuna Sandwich
a Day Keeps Heart Problems at Bay?
Eating More Fish
Cuts Preterm Delivery Risk
Online Resources
In a Related Story
...
Eating More Fish
Cuts Preterm Delivery Risk
If you have just found
out that you are pregnant, one of the best things you might do
for your baby is have a tuna fish sandwich. Or cod, or scrod,
or some other fish dish.
A Danish study finds
that low intake of fish during pregnancy is associated with a
higher risk of premature delivery and low birthweight—both major
problems for newborns.
The study, which included
more than 8,700 pregnant women, is "the largest ever done," says
Sjurour F. Olsen, a senior scientist in the Danish Epidemiology
Science Center in Copenhagen, lead author of a report in the Feb.
23 issue of the British Medical Journal.
It does not take a lot
of fish in the diet to reduce the risk, Olsen says—one meal a
week will produce the protective effect.
The risk of premature
delivery and low birthweight was directly related to fish intake,
the study finds. It happened for 7.1 percent of the women who
never ate fish and for only 1.9 percent of those who ate fish
at least once a week.
The reason is not entirely
clear, but it probably is related to the omega-3 fatty acids found
in fish, Olsen says. Those chemicals are poly-unsaturated fatty
acids that play a role in the body's production of prostaglandins,
which in turn play a role in the widening of the cervix that initiates
childbirth, he says.
It is too early to recommend
that women eat a lot of fish or take fish oil supplements during
pregnancy, says Dr. Michael Katz, vice president for research
at the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation.
"One of the worst possible outcomes is that people get hooked
on data and go overboard," he says.
While "there is no harm
in eating fish," Katz says, the real story on its value during
pregnancy will come from a study that has begun in China, in a
region where fish-eating is not common. Pregnant women are being
given fish oil and olive oil, and the outcomes of their pregnancies
will be recorded. Results are not expected for a while, Katz says.
Showing a beneficial
effect of eating fish during pregnancy is "an exciting possibility,"
Katz adds. "But whether it is real will have to be determined
by the prospective study."
"There are certain things
we do know," Katz says. "A woman should start taking folic acid
before she gets pregnant, to prevent neural tube defects. She
shouldn't smoke and shouldn't drink during pregnancy. And she
should be sure there is good health care supervision for a proper
diet, exercise and so on."
Always consult your
physician for more information.
Online
Resources:
American
Heart Association
British
Medical Journal
Circulation,
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal
of the American Association (JAMA)
March
of Dimes
New
England Journal of Medicine
|